Because of the Covid-19 pandemic, how we interact with the DWC district offices has been, and continues to be, significantly impacted. This went well beyond how we attended hearings, but also how proposed settlements could get before a judge for approval or basic petitions for LC 5710 fees or costs could be filed as well.
One of the most helpful developments was the ability to do virtual walk-throughs of settlement documents by getting before a workers’ compensation judge (WCJ) utilizing the Lifesize platform. This change went into effect on Jan. 11, 2021.
Now, after more than a year of fine-tuning this process and everyone getting used to it, the DWC has decided to do away with it. Beginning Sept. 6, 2022, every DWC district office except Eureka will now allow an in-person walk-through like before the pandemic.
However, in announcing this change, it was also mandated that the virtual walk-through procedure will no longer be allowed. Thus, to get a settlement approved, the settlement documents, along with a succinct letter highlighting the terms of the settlement, either can be mailed / e-filed with the DWC district offices or you can go in-person. The same can be said for all the other types of documents that can be walked-through per CCR Section 10789.
This has the greatest impact in terms of walking-through settlements.
Why would you want to physically go to DWC district office to get a settlement approved? The simple answer is speed. It is easily the fastest way to get a settlement before a WCJ and the settlement approved (and yes, possibly suspended if something is out of order). Otherwise, mailing / e-filing settlement documents turns into a waiting game of when the settlement is going to land on a WCJ’s desk for review.
Thus, before you go running off to your local DWC district office to do a walk-through, here are some friendly tips and reminders to help you avoid getting your settlement suspended and/or having to make another trip.
- Have a well-written letter ready to go that you can provide the WCJ reviewing the settlement that provides them with the key details of the settlement. This means more than just the gross / net settlement amounts and how much the Applicant’s Attorney is receiving, but also discuss what benefits were issued, how is the SJDB voucher being handled, was the claim accepted or denied, and whether there are apportionment issues
- Were all the supporting medical reports already filed with the DWC district office? If not, then you need to submit them with the settlement documents. Otherwise, how is the reviewing WCJ supposed to know whether the settlement is adequate or not.
- Are there EDD or child support liens at issue? If they were already resolved, include the settlement agreement so there will be no doubt that issue has been addressed.
- On a more basic level, make sure you have your cover and separator sheets. If you just show up with your C&R or Stipulated Award, then prepare yourself for some extra handwritten paperwork.
- Bring a proposed OACR/Award with you. True, the reviewing WCJ may prefer to complete their own, but to make the walk-through as easy as possible for the reviewing WCJ to approve your settlement.
- Bring a lien affidavit that discusses whether any liens are outstanding, and if so, what steps have been undertaken to resolve them.
Of course, the above is most applicable to cases where all sides are represented. If you are requesting approval of a pro per applicant’s settlement, then you will need even more documents submitted with the settlement than what is discussed above. While each district office, or each WCJ for that matter, may require different documents in these situations, the following generally are always necessary and should be ready to go:
- A rating of the applicable reports, whether from the DEU, and outside rating or the claims administrator’s rating.
- Disclosure of all TD benefits issued and when, which is easiest with a benefits print-out.
- If the settlement is not based on a PQME report, a copy of the notice to Applicant that s/he has a right to a QME evaluation.
- If there is not also a PTP PR-4 (i.e. – MMI/P&S report), what steps were taken to try and obtain one?
- A wage statement so the reviewing WCJ can determine whether the TD rate is correct
- Medical reports from the date of injury and not just MMI/P&S reports.
- Any offers of modified work.
- Were all the body parts claimed in the application addressed in the C&R/Stipulated Award? If not, you will need to explain why.
While we all have grown accustomed to the convenience of handling settlements from the comfort of our office or home, we have to remind ourselves of the intricacies of walking-through settlements in person if we want or need a quick turnaround for an Order approving.
You do not want to be at court, about to do your walk-through, when the light bulb goes off that additional documents should have come along for the ride to help assist the reviewing WCJ to assess the adequacy of the settlement. Err on the side of over-inclusion. The worst case scenario is that you brought documents with you that you ultimately did not need.
Got a question about workers’ compensation defense issues? Feel free to contact Daniel R. Stevens. Mr. Stevens is a workers’ compensation defense attorney and partner at Bradford & Barthel’s Ventura location, where he aggressively defends employers, insurers, and third-party administrators. Please feel free to contact Daniel at dstevens@bradfordbarthel.com or at (805)677-4808.
Viewing this website does not form an attorney/client relationship between you and Bradford & Barthel, LLP or any of its attorneys. This website is for informational purposes only and does not contain legal advice. Please do not act or refrain from acting based on anything you read on this site. This document is not a substitute for legal advice and may not address every factual scenario. If you have a legal question, we encourage you to contact your favorite Bradford & Barthel, LLP attorney to discuss the legal issues applicable to your unique case. No website is entirely secure, so please be cautious with information provided through the contact form or email. Do not assume confidentiality exists in anything you send through this website or email, until an attorney/client relationship is formed.