by (November 1, 2005)
Bradford & Barthel believes “double dipping” should be limited to visits to Baskin-Robbins! Unfortunately many QMEs, PTPs, and even AMEs are attempting to get applicants “a little something extra” when applying the DRE method to…
Read More
by (November 1, 2005)
Did you know that 3 + 4 = 5 when applying the DRE (Diagnosis Related Estimate) method to the lumbar and thoracic spine? It’s strange, but true. If an applicant qualifies for a DRE Category…
Read More
by (November 1, 2005)
Change is the name of the game in 2005. It appears that the legislative intent was much more than putting California on a “diet” to reduce its ever growing workers’ compensation waistline. The intent was…
Read More
by (September 3, 2005)
Per the AMA Guides, a 0% WPI (whole person impairment) rating “is assigned… if the impairment has no significant organ or body system functional consequences and does not limit the performance of… activities of daily…
Read More
by (September 2, 2005)
There is a great deal of information (and misinformation) about when the AMA Guides and new PDRS are to be applied. Given that the application of the “new” rating system can easily result in a…
Read More
by (September 1, 2005)
A subject of great debate and much criticism, the new Permanent Disability Rating Schedule used RAND study results “to establish the ratio of average California standard ratings to proportional wage losses for each of 22…
Read More
