Understanding the importance of subrogation strategies on third-party claims can save defendants in the workers’ compensation system large sums of money.
When an applicant is injured in a work-related auto accident, that often gives rise to a third-party claim that the workers’ compensation carrier can subrogate against. In this blog post, we will give you a basic primer about third-party claims and how subrogation works.
BASIC FACTS ABOUT CALIFORNIA THIRD-PARTY CLAIMS
In California, workers’ compensation is typically the exclusive remedy for employees injured on the job.
However, if a third-party, other than the employer, is responsible for an injury, the worker may file a civil personal injury lawsuit for additional compensation. Circumstances that would give rise to a third-party claim would be if the injury was caused by a party that was not the employer or a co-worker or another party’s negligence caused the accident.
A frequently occurring example would be a delivery driver injured in a motor vehicle accident caused by another motorist. The delivery driver would be able to file a workers’ compensation claim with their employer’s workers’ compensation carrier, and the driver could simultaneously file a third-party lawsuit against the other driver.
Subrogation scenarios aren’t just limited to auto accidents. There are many different scenarios where a third-party lawsuit may be viable under California law. For instance, sometimes the third-party is a manufacturer who made a ladder with a product defect. On other occasions, the third-party could be a property owner or contractor.
While this dual-claim approach can increase financial recovery for the injured worker, it also provides a mechanism for employers and their insurers to recover monies paid on a workers’ compensation claim that were caused in whole, or in part, by third-parties.
There are many complexities in third-party litigation that must be considered when seeking employer reimbursement and recovery against third-parties.
EMPLOYER RECOVERY METHODS
Generally, employers and their insurers have three primary means to recover benefits paid to injured workers:
- Direct lawsuit where the employer sues the responsible party,
- Intervention where the employer joins the applicant’s lawsuit to claim a portion of any settlement or verdict, and
- Lien claim where the employer asserts a right to reimbursement from the workers’ payout without active litigation. Each of these recovery methods have their own unique complexities, benefits, and drawbacks as well as timing considerations. It is important that every workers’ compensation case include an evaluation of the potential of a third-party recovery and if it is determined that third-party liability exists to take the appropriate steps as early as possible to obtain the best possible outcome given the unique factual backgrounds of each case.
- At the WCAB, a defendant can also file a petition for credit against any sum recouped by the applicant in the third-party litigation.
SETTLEMENT STRATEGIES
There are various settlement scenarios that might arise in third-party litigation, including:
- Global settlement where the injured worker and the employer negotiate how to divide a lump-sum offer,
- Injured worker settlement – where the worker settles independently leaving the employer to recover its lien separately, and
- Employer settlement where the employer negotiates directly with the third-party defendant to resolve its reimbursement claims.
- In cases where the third-party recovery is low, a defendant can treat the credit against a third-party suit as a bargaining chip. Waiver of a credit can be a useful bargaining chip.
One important caveat to keep in mind when considering recovery is the existence of employer fault, or employer negligence.
If the employer was partially at fault its reimbursement claim may be reduced proportionally pursuant to the Witt v. Jackson rule that holds that an employer who contributed to an employee’s injury cannot recover full reimbursement (Witt v. Jackson (1961) 57 Cal.2d 57, 72.)
This may significantly impact employer recovery and is an important early consideration in determining the best course of action for pursing a third-party recovery.
TIMING OF SETTLEMENTS AND PROTECTIONS FOR EMPLOYERS
The timing of settlement in the workers’ compensation case and the third-party case do not always line up and one case may settle prior to the other. This creates various settlement scenarios and important considerations for both the employer and its insurer as well as the injured worker.
Sometimes there is not a final workers’ compensation award, but the parties want to settle. In those situations, the employer and the injured worker may negotiate lump sum settlement in the third-party case that may or may not impact further reimbursements claims in the workers’ compensation case depending on how the settlement is structured.
For example, a $30,000 injury settlement in a personal injury case could be split as follows:
- $10,000 goes to the personal injury attorney
- $10,000 goes directly to the workers’ compensation carrier
- $10,000 goes directly to the applicant, but the workers’ compensation carrier gets to assert a $10,000 credit against the workers’ compensation recovery.
In other cases, sometimes the WCAB issues a final award prior to resolution of the third-party case. In that scenario, the employer may continue the payment of benefits but seek a credit from the third-party recovery as against the obligation to pay ongoing workers’ compensation benefits.
There are some protections for defendants that fail to timely and properly pursue their third-party rights.
For example, under LC 3860(a), a settlement or release is invalid unless both the employer and employee receive notice. This ensures the employer can recover compensation paid or owed, along with any special damages while allowing the employee to seek full damages.
Although an employee may settle a third-party lawsuit without the employer’s consent, they must provide notice, enabling the employer to seek reimbursement. Failure to notify before settlement may result in the employer suing for breach of duty or claiming a credit against future benefits.
The prevalence of online court dockets has made tracking down personal injury lawsuits somewhat easier. So if a defendant believes a third-party suit has been filed and that applicant did not give them notice, we suggest that you investigate the dockets of the relevant state and federal jurisdictions for any third-party suits.
TAKEAWAY
An assessment should be made in every new claim as to whether there is a potential of a third-party recovery and if so whether the specific facts of the case make it economically worthwhile to pursue. If a third-party claim might be viable, it is important to develop a plan of action on how to proceed and which type of recovery method should be utilized.
By taking a strategic approach to third-party claims, employers and insurers can mitigate financial losses while ensuring that injured workers receive appropriate compensation from all responsible parties.
Scot A. Ginther is a Partner at Bradford & Barthel’s Fresno location. If you have questions about subrogation, third-party suits, or other workers’ compensation defense issues, feel free to contact Scot at sginther@bradfordbartel.com, or by calling 559.442.3602.
Viewing this website does not form an attorney/client relationship between you and Bradford & Barthel, LLP or any of its attorneys. This website is for informational purposes only and does not contain legal advice. Please do not act or refrain from acting based on anything you read on this site. This document is not a substitute for legal advice and may not address every factual scenario. If you have a legal question, we encourage you to contact your favorite Bradford & Barthel, LLP attorney to discuss the legal issues applicable to your unique case. No website is entirely secure, so please be cautious with information provided through the contact form or email. Do not assume confidentiality exists in anything you send through this website or email, until an attorney/client relationship is formed.