Rising workers’ compensation costs across the board have led the Workers’ Compensation Insurance Rating Bureau of California (WCIRB) to forecast its highest combined ratio in years, which means that insurance carriers are losing money at unusually-high rate.
A quick look at the WCIRB Quarterly Experience Report dated 12/31/24 shows that medical, indemnity, and friction costs are up across the board. Our friends at WorkCompCentral wrote a detailed summary of the report, and pointed out that:
- The Combined Ratio is at it’s highest in 14 years, at 123%.
- (Note: When the ratio is over 100%, carriers are losing money. When it is under 100%, carriers are making money because underwriting is profitable.)
- Indemnity claim frequency has increased
- Total claim costs are 6% higher than 2023
- Indemnity claims severity is at the highest it’s been in a decade
- Medical severity has increased each year since 2016
- Allocated Los Adjustment Expenses (ALAE), which are commonly known as litigation costs, are up about 10% from 2023 to 2024.
- Medical cost containment increased due to higher medical costs.
To put it more simply, you don’t have to understand each and every term mentioned here – all you have to do is click on the WCIRB report, scroll down to the graphs, and look at how almost every single graph is at its highest point on the right (which is the year of 2024).
Combine that with a nationwide study from the WCRI that attorney representation boosts claims valuation, and one quickly gets to the conclusion that it is more expensive to write workers’ compensation coverage than just about ever before.
REFORM
As Bradford and Barthel equity partner Kimberly Wagner noted on a recent episode of the Comp Corner podcast, workers’ compensation reform bills used to be on a cycle of every 8-10 years. She cited the reforms in 1997, 2005, 2013, and … our current state of being well-overdue for a new reform bill.
Some of the areas that are ripe for reform are:
- Interpreter costs
- The niche industry of petition for non-IBR costs
- The relatively low bar for applicant’s attorneys to get additional panels in other specialties, even when there is no medical evidence of treatment for these other specialties.
- Legal doctrines which work as an end-around on the utilization review process, and actively punish carriers for acting in good faith.
Fortunately, there are solutions to these types of problems:
- The DIR could set an interpreter fee schedule (this was required by prior legislation)
- New statutes and/or regulations could provide time limits and other requirements to limit the amount of petitions for non-IBR
- Workers’ compensation could benefit from having a statute akin to California Code of Civil Procedure section 998. For example, if an applicant insists on going to a QME in an additional specialty, and the QME finds no PD for that specialty – then applicant would be liable for the cost of the QME’s bills.
- Statutory amendments that eliminate most exceptions to the UR/IMR system.
Solutions like this need to be studied and vetted to prevent additional gamesmanship, but something is necessary. Something is better than nothing.
If no changes are made, we could see a return to the workers’ compensation crisis from the early 2000s, which played a part in then-Gov. Gray Davis’ recall election, which he ultimately lost to Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger. (For those who are too young to remember those days, employer premiums skyrocketed as carriers were going out of business. This led to the reform bill of SB 899 in 2005.)
Time is running out for reform under the current administration of Gov. Gavin Newsom. Due to term limits, Newsom’s last full year of being governor will be 2026, as he will have served two four-year terms by then.
With no reform bill on the current horizon, it’s safe to presume that costs will continue to rise in 2025, as there’s no evidence that the trends identified by the WCIRB will suddenly reverse themselves. This leaves 2026 as Gov. Newsom’s last chance to do something about workers’ compensation reform.
It’s no secret that our governor has his eyes on the White House, and it’s even more evident by his frequent forays and disagreements with the current occupant of the 1600 Pennsylvania Ave in Washington D.C. Passing beneficial workers’ compensation reforms that reduce severity and frequency could give Newsom some pro-business accolades to brag about as he enters a primary on the national stage.
It’s been far more than 8 years – employers and carriers are most certainly due for reforms.
Got a question about workers’ compensation defense issues? Feel free to contact John P. Kamin. Mr. Kamin is a workers’ compensation defense attorney and partner at Bradford & Barthel’s Woodland Hills location, where he monitors the recent legislative affairs as the firm’s Director of the Editorial Board. Mr. Kamin previously worked as a journalist for WorkCompCentral, where he reported on work-related injuries in all 50 states. Please feel free to contact John at jkamin@bradfordbarthel.com or at (818) 654-0411.
Viewing this website does not form an attorney/client relationship between you and Bradford & Barthel, LLP or any of its attorneys. This website is for informational purposes only and does not contain legal advice. Please do not act or refrain from acting based on anything you read on this site. This document is not a substitute for legal advice and may not address every factual scenario. If you have a legal question, we encourage you to contact your favorite Bradford & Barthel, LLP attorney to discuss the legal issues applicable to your unique case. No website is entirely secure, so please be cautious with information provided through the contact form or email. Do not assume confidentiality exists in anything you send through this website or email, until an attorney/client relationship is formed.